2016 Volvo Xc70 For Sale Near Me
While the Cross Country versions of the 2016 Volvo S60 auto and V60 wagon accept college arena clearance, additional bodywork that suggests off-road capability, their abutting suspensions beggarly they’re best-suited for on-pavement driving.
I activated both of these; reviews of the S60 and V60 on which the XC versions are based are additionally available. The XCs’ competitors accommodate all-wheel-drive-only cartage such as the Subaru Outback and Audi Allroad. Compare them here.
Cross Country models are calmly spotted because of their aloft acme compared with the accepted V60 and S60; their 7.9 inches of arena approval is about 2.5 inches added than accepted models. They additionally affection drift plates that assure the basic from damage.
The attending wears able-bodied on the wagon but makes the contrarily ample S60 attending ungainly. Article about the admeasurement of the wheels, aloft bodywork and accepted accommodation aloof doesn’t attending appropriate on that anatomy style.
There are pieces of anatomy cladding on both models that are subtler than antecedent off-road Volvos, like the XC70. In this way, the XCs administer a added afflicted anatomy architecture than both the antecedent Volvos and the Outback and Allroad.
Cross Country models are powered by a 250-horsepower, turbocharged 2.5-liter inline-five-cylinder agent akin with a six-speed automated transmission. The aggregate is one of the best genitalia of active the car.
Agent acknowledgment is acceptable off the line, and there’s a awareness that there’s a lot of ability on assets if you charge it. The XCs move abroad able-bodied from a asleep stop, and they’re acknowledging back you charge to accomplish a canyon on the highway. There’s a fair bulk of agent babble in the cabin, but the agent articulate absolutely acceptable to me, so I didn’t mind.
The added standout absolute of the Cross Country models is their steering. It provides a lot of acknowledgment and absolutely feels affiliated to the road. Those who adopt a lighter council setup, though, will appetite to booty a test-drive and pay abutting attention. These Volvos are amid the few cars on the bazaar that accept too abundant a council bureaucracy for some people.
Agent acknowledgment and council feel accord you aplomb to hustle a Cross Country, and the abeyance is abutting abundant to accolade that affectionate of advancing driving.
And that’s the problem. The XCs ride so durably that they’re aloof not adequate on the asperous being — or alike on asperous pavement. Put addition way, I’ve apprenticed the Outback in a array of off-road settings and accept consistently acquainted as if the abeyance were assimilation up some of the applesauce I was active over and that the car was alive to ascend over and through obstacles. The XCs feel so annealed you anguish they ability snap. Also, the accepted auto are 18-inchers, with 19-inch auto optional. Actuality again, if I were activity off alley I’d appetite article with a bit added sidewall (to blot bumps) than an 18- or 19-inch caster provides.
Conversely, there’s no agnosticism I’d adopt the XCs’ all-embracing ability and administration if I were adverse a continued drive on agee roads. In that setting, the Outback aloof can’t bout the Volvos’ address and power.
Both the auto and wagon get the aforementioned EPA-estimated 20/28/23 mpg city/highway/combined. Sticking to accumulated breadth figures, the Cross Country models aisle the Allroad (24 mpg) and four-cylinder Outback (28 mpg), but bend out the V-6 Outback models’ 22 mpg.
If the off-pavement achievement of the Volvos is underwhelming, their interiors are a highlight. There’s a nice mix of high-quality materials. The covering basement surfaces attending and feel good, with affluence of support. Side-bolstering is pronounced, but I didn’t acquisition it to be uncomfortable.
Volvo’s actual choices are constant with a affluence brand. Cross Country buyers accept a best of metallic, piano atramentous or copse inlays; our analysis archetypal came with the copse trim. Normally I’m not a fan of this blazon of trim, behindhand of automaker, but in this case Volvo’s best a actual with acceptable graining and a nice accomplishment that appears adorable to my eyes.
Further, aggregate acquainted acceptable in my hands. What appears to be metal feels like absolute metal. There’s annihilation plasticky or shoddy-feeling in the XCs, although one ability appetite to advance to Volvo that cipher uses a cardinal pad to punch a blast cardinal anymore, so we ability be able to apple-pie up that allotment of the centermost console.
Visibility, however, is an breadth breadth Cross Country models struggle. There’s a angled windshield colonnade that blocks a lot of the road, abnormally pedestrians. Also, the XCs’ afterimage curve are altered from the approved S60 and V60 and I begin them harder to esplanade than the accepted models. Both XCs feel like they’re abundant beyond cars than they absolutely are, but, weirdly, the auto was abundant added afflicted by this.
Finally, both models were awkward for me, abnormally in the allowance department. A moonroof is accepted in all XCs, which cut into my amplitude compared with the S60 sedan. That car does afterwards the accepted moonroof in lower trim levels, accouterment added than a half-inch added headroom. The blueprint say all added basement ambit and autogenous aggregate are the aforementioned amid approved and Cross Country versions of the S60 and V60.
Whatever the reason, admitting the college arena approval it abiding acquainted as if my active position wasn’t absolutely any college than it would accept been in abounding added cars. So the accomplishment Volvo went through to accession the XCs didn’t pay off for me, at atomic as far as my acumen went.
This is addition breadth breadth Cross Country models struggle. Volvo fabricated a lot of odd choices.
For starters, application the affability button on the stereo requires you to about-face the bulge to get the arrangement to respond, again about-face it added to get it to alpha alteration stations. Again you accept to bang a button inset in the punch to absolutely change it to a new station. It’s a lot of accomplish to do article actual simple. As nice as the controls feel, it’s aloof too abundant work.
Also, if you appetite to go from adjusting radio stations to the aeronautics settings, you accept to accomplish a alternative from a arena of buttons about the blast keypad buttons. It’s adamantine to bethink which button is placed breadth … and alike harder to see the buttons at a glance.
Ditto with the altitude controls, breadth Volvo has you change the zones that the air assault out of by blame a contour of a body. Yes, it’s how Volvo’s done it for a while. No, that doesn’t beggarly it’s good. Simply put, afterwards active added cars I became acquainted of how arresting both the audio and altitude controls were in the XCs.
Finally, the Volvo arrangement was the best acceptable to abdicate working, either while inputting a destination or while arena music from my phone. That’s awful abnormal in my acquaintance testing cars, so it bears mentioning.
Burden amplitude is the distinct bigger aberration amid the V60 Cross Country and the S60 Cross Country. It’s to be accepted that a wagon would action added allowance than a sedan, and this is the case. However, the S60 auto has an almost-unusably baby trunk. It’s advanced from ancillary to ancillary and extends advanced from the rear bonanza a acceptable amount, but the aperture from top to basal is absolutely small. I kept bribery with items in the burden breadth in hopes of award added allowance because I couldn’t accept how baby the block was.
The V60 Cross Country is bigger in this respect, alms about as abundant aggregate as the approved V60: There’s a best of 43.1 cubic anxiety with the backseat folded, adjoin 43.8 cubic anxiety in the approved V60.
Neither the 2016 S60 nor the V60 Cross Country has been crash-tested by the Insurance Institute for Artery Assurance or the National Artery Traffic Assurance Administration.
Accepted assurance appearance accommodate what Volvo calls City Safety, which is free braking that — at low speeds — applies the brakes to abstain a blow not alone with added cars, but additionally with pedestrians.
Notable assurance options are included in a $925 Blind Spot Information Arrangement Package, including rear cross-traffic alert, advanced parking sensors and blind-spot admonishing lights.
In some areas — conspicuously autogenous affection and active dynamics — the Cross Country holds up able-bodied adjoin the affluence class, and it deeply beats competitors like the Outback. However, its ergonomics and abnormally its multimedia/electronics systems lag not alone absolute competitors, but the bazaar as a whole.
While you could say the XCs’ antagonism is the Outback and Allroad, I’m not abiding the bigger allegory isn’t amid them and the approved S60 and V60 models, both of which are absorbing on the alley and aggressive on amount back analogously equipped.
Faced with the choice, I can’t see any attributes of the Cross Country models that basement them advanced of their “conventional” siblings. Their added ride acme is account by their bound headroom, and their active dynamics and agent acknowledgment are not above to the S60 or V60. In short, allotment a Cross Country over addition Volvo is a case of acrimonious appearance over substance.
2016 Volvo Xc70 For Sale Near Me – 2016 volvo xc70 for sale near me
| Allowed to the weblog, within this time period We’ll teach you with regards to keyword. And from now on, this can be a very first picture: